• mo_ztt ✅@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This has some explanation. TL;DR get ready to be underwhelmed. This was based on some earlier efforts e.g. one in Sweden that changed bird names containing “neger” (negro), “kaffer” (a racial slur), or “zigenarfågel” (gypsy bird), but the stuff they’ve been able to find in North America is, well:

      • Oldsquaw (a slur)
      • Inca Dove (historically inaccurate, no overlap with Incas)
      • McCown’s Longspur (McCown was a confederate)

      Maybe there were more they didn’t mention but my guess is that there’s a reason they’re writing the story while dancing around what names are actually being changed.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Aw man, I thought I was gonna find out there’s birds with old person shit like what my grandma used to call Brazil nuts lol

        I guess that’s a good kind of disappointment to have

          • GONADS125@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not as messed up as Midwesterners calling stones sticking out of the ground risking dulling the mower blades n-word heads…

            Couldn’t believe that one when I heard it used by a racist country bumpkin dumbass.

                • glimse@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Could be! Or maybe just a more rural thing. I grew up on the border of a major city and while it was generally frowned upon, I was no stranger to a lot of charged terms.

                  It (embarrassingly) took me until my 20s to realize the phrase I used to say something was poorly cobbled something together meant “rigged up like a black guy did it” - I assumed it was some ancient English word.

        • mo_ztt ✅@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          To me it sounds like it used to be that way, but at this point this is just someone questing around for a “problem” to solve so they can prove to the world that they’re a really good person.

          • Corran1138@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s a problem in that it ignores the fact that McCown (who happened to then fight for the Confederacy after) collected this bird and gave it to another white man, who ‘named’ it. The bird was already well known to Native American tribes in Texas and Arizona. So to say that McCown ‘discovered’ it is just blatantly wrong. The name that the AOS will go with is the ‘thick-billed longspur’ as it’s anatomically accurate and doesn’t make it seem like McCown discovered this bird.

            • Calavera@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So you are saying they are gonna change all European centric names for something regarding their phisical attribute? Or is it just this one?

              • mo_ztt ✅@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I believe they’re trying to change any bird that’s named after a person, and any European-centric name that replaced an existing indigenous name.

                • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  But, that’s a weird tactic. I mean, the rock dove/common pigeon is native to Spain, Senegal and Sri Lanka. What is going to be it’s indigenous name?

                  Another example: Heerman’s Gull is native to the westcoast of north america, from Vancouver to Guadalajara. Obviously none of the natives called it Heerman’s Gull, since the guy wasn’t born till the early 19th century. I wouldn’t be surprised if it has two dozen “indigenous names” before leaving the US, so what are we going to pick?

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            To me it’s whatever. The upsides are small but they still far outweigh the one downside

            I doubt these people are just doing it for kudos, though.

            • mo_ztt ✅@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean, broadly I do agree with this. It’s whatever. Maybe I was too harsh. I’m not trying to be critical of someone who’s at least trying to make the world a better place, even if I think the way they’re going about it is a little artificial and silly. I do think it’s artificial and silly though.

              • glimse@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s a little silly but I’m for making these changes but the only real defense for keeping them is “it’s always been that way!” which is just a flawed argument

                • mo_ztt ✅@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Hold on, lemme put on my downvote boots.

                  To me the defense is, if people are going around and saying that calling it an “Inca Dove” is racist or misogynistic and we all have to spend time and money and effort changing it around to something else, then it’s going to hinder genuine efforts to resolve racism or misogyny because some people are going to start putting it alongside the “Inca Dove” thing into a category of “stupid stuff that doesn’t matter.” Changing “Oldsquaw” sounds great because that’s actually racist. Changing the confederate name thing, eh, it seems weird to me but I can see it. “Inca Dove,” alright now you’re just making up stuff to get upset about and asking everyone else to play along with it and if they don’t want to, they’re some kind of bad person.

                  Just my opinion.

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tits and boobies come to mind.

      Sorry, what were we talking about? Birds?

    • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Many Latin and Greek names of birds are descriptive. For example what people often call the “tit” bird is actually Parus major, which you could roughly translate into “a bit bigger”. And they are the biggest of the tit birds.

      And another “tit” actually is called Lophophanes cristatus. Which roughly means “showing the comb (lophophanes) with hood (cristatus)”.

      • PoastRotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can’t imagine a world in which calling a bird a “tit” in the first place was not the product of a poorly thought out public poll

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          “tit” is old-style english mean “something small” or “a little bit”. You can still spot the word in old sayings like the biblical “Jot or tittle”.

          On the other hand, we also woodpeckers, which is kinda similar in that it has a common translation, but also a hilarious one.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re aiming for more descriptive names, so it’s probably not going to be a “vote for the best name” type of public involvement

    • PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You actually seem to have got it.

      Here’s a better source that suggests that they are interested in changing birds named after people, rather than birds named after slurs. It’s linked in this article. I really hope that shames op. We need to be better.

      Whether or not those people were bigots, they were probably white and male. Same as the anatomists that named the lady parts.

      There’s just a tradition of the first person to scientifically describe a “thing” getting to name it.

      It’s not great, but people that get to travel the world describing species and knowing enough to scientifically describe lady parts, etc are not poor people, at least until post war science. They still would have been mostly white and male, but they wouldn’t have had to be as much independently wealthy.

  • Vandals_handle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I believe if species being renamed were known and named by Indigenous peoples, that name is the proper name to use. These organisms were not discovered by western science any more than the continent was discovered by westerners. Not only would it be a small sign of respect but would help protect Indigenous language and culture.

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s part of a broader movement to rename birds to be more descriptive. “McCow’s longspur” is both unmemorable and nondescriptive, “thick-billed longspur” puts one of its distinguishing features in the name.

      The fact there’s a lot of racists who had birds named after them hundreds of years ago is just one more thing to add to the pile. The names would benefit from being changed even if they were all saints.

  • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Finally. I think it’s fair to name a bird after you if you are its creator. Being the first person to document it doesn’t mean much to me and certainly doesn’t mean they can name a bird after themselves.

    Edit: i guess the downvoters believe that a bird is not discovered until a white man sees it.

  • nevemsenki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t wait to periodically rename everything every ~70 years as societal standards change.

    • ZeroCool@feddit.chOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can’t wait to periodically rename everything every ~70 years as societal standards change.

      Well, I guess you can take solace in the fact that unless you’re in grade school right now you probably won’t be alive the next time the American Ornithological Society decides to re-examine the english names for birds.

      • ferret@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even those still in grade school shouldn’t be concerned as most of these bird species won’t survive climate change on the track it is currently taking