Rules: explain why

Ready player one.

That has to be one of the cringiest movies I’ve seen, is tries so hard, too hard with it’s “WE LOVE YOU NERD, YOU’RE SO COOL FOR PLAYING GAMES AND GETTING THIS 80S REFERENCE” message and the whole “corporation bad, the people good” narrative seems written for toddlers… The fan service feels cheap and adds nothing to the story.

Finally, they trying to make the people believe that very attractive girl with a barely visible red tint spot on her face is “ugly”… Like wtf?

Yet it received decent reviews plus being one of the most successful movies of that year.

  • Mighty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    i read this and nobody wrote about Shutter Island? it was so so bad i hated it. I hated how people said it was so clever. it was one of the only movies that I spotted continuity errors and mistakes on the first watch in the theatre. and I do NOT believe those mistakes were intentional. the movie was so obvious is the “clever bits” that it tried to do that these mistakes were just not in the same lane. the movie tried to be an Aranovsky movie, but Scorcese is not that director.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      To me the “clever bits” felt like Scorsese watched Memento or The Sixth Sense and thought “I can do that”.

      The joy of those movies is watching a second or third time and seeing it all differently, and you don’t do that with Shutter Island. You spot it all the first time through.