Hoping to find something free and open.

  • Chris@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    4 days ago

    Bookwyrm if you want something Fediverse.

    Storygraph I think is the other popular one (I’ve not used it)

    • y0y0ma@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      I have been using TheStorygraph and I am amazed by the quality of some of the recommendations.

      • Vanth@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        Also a Storygraph user. And I’ll add in praise for their migration tool that carried over my Goodreads data so I didn’t lose my history nor my to-read list.

    • TheFunkyMonk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ve been using Storygraph for a couple of years now and love it. The only feature it’s missing for me that Goodreads has (although its implementation is awkward anyway) is the ability to add a note to a book you haven’t started yet.

      My workaround for now is a tagging system with friends names like #recommendation #recommendation-amy and if I want some more detailed info, I made a custom shortcut to transform a Storygraph share URL into a note in my book notes folder in Obsidian.

  • illi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    In case you use it for tracking what you’ve read and what you would like to read - OpenReads

  • brandon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I’ve been using Hardcover. Still very much a WIP and community is still pretty small but it seems very promising with a public api and ambitions to open source.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Well, they let me order my lists (and actually display the order). That’s good.

      No way to bulk add books to a list? Not so good.

      Worth keeping an eye on, though.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 days ago

        They could have destroyed me… by just saying “book clubs” but alas, they don’t keep up with the times, apparently not even Victorian era…

    • missingno@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      You should probably double check whether you even understood OP’s question before acting smug and condescending.

    • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Disregarding that you completely fail to understand OP’s question; physical books suck. We used then until a few decades ago because we didn’t have anything better now we do. It’s called an e-reader and it’s superior to dead tree books in every single way.

      • proudblond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Can’t say I agree with you. Call me old fashioned but I like having the physical book. It lends a vibe to the experience that e-readers bypass simply by being digital.

        • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          The user-experience of physical books is pretty bad. They are bulky and heavy, unlike an e-reader you can’t keep 1000+ books in your coat pocket. You need an external light source, which limits where and when you can read. If you want to read a new book you have to go to a physical store or library (both have extremely limited selections due to the aforementioned bulkiness) or you have to order online which takes at least a day for delivery. With an e-reader I can pick a book and start reading it 10 seconds later without even leaving the comfort of my bed.

          Then there’s small things like full text search.